🔗 Share this article European Leaders Nearing Agreement on Using Frozen Moscow's Funds for Kyiv European leaders, together with those from the United Kingdom, are becoming more confident that a proposal to provide Ukraine with a €140bn financial package backed by immobilized Russian central bank deposits can be agreed upon by the end of the year, a move considered critical for Kyiv to maintain its defense efforts. G7 Discussions and EU Summit Proposals from the European Commission were reviewed at a gathering of Group of Seven financial chiefs in Washington last recently and will be debated at an EU leaders summit on Thursday in the EU headquarters. US involvement remains uncertain. Radosław Sikorski stated last week he believed “the matter of the use, on behalf of the target of invasion, of the frozen Moscow's funds is moving toward a happy resolution.” He added that an agreement was attainable by the close of 2025: “It’s straightforward, either we use the invader's funds or we will have to rely on our own resources. Don’t ask me which I prefer.” Loan Mechanism and Legal Framework Under the plan – detailed in a two-page paper by the European Commission last recently – the European Union would provide a €140 billion zero-interest loan to the Ukrainian government secured by the Moscow's frozen holdings held at the Euroclear agency. The financial package would be issued on the condition that Russia would utilize the frozen assets to cover war reparations when the war ends. “What we are suggesting is not confiscation,” a high-ranking EU official told reporters earlier this period. Kyiv's Financial Requirements and Assistance The country has run an yearly financial shortfall as it has been fighting off the Russian invasion. In the past, it has depended on partner nations to support it with extra borrowing. But rising expenses and uncertain US support are increasing the financial commitment on Ukraine's European allies. In September, Ukraine projected it would require $50bn in international assistance for the coming year. Specifically, European Union representatives believe Ukraine will need an immediate injection of funds for its military operations from spring next year, with no indication of advancement in negotiations. Brussels' Role and Worries The nation holds €183 billion of frozen assets at Brussels-based Euroclear, and has requested detailed guarantees that it will not be left alone with the cost, if the scheme collapses, causing a flood of legal claims. It also wants more influence on the G7 to take similar measures to aid Kyiv. Global Collaboration and Guarantees Part of the scheme is that G7 countries would club together to underwrite the loans, mainly to reassure the host nation, where most of the Russian central bank money, frozen at the start of the full scale conflict, are held. The UK is anticipated to make a contribution to this element of the plan even though possessing limited immobilized Russian assets itself. Discussions are understood to be ongoing over the participations of each Group of Seven nation to these assurances – including whether the United States will participate. US participation is less certain, but the United States also only holds a small quantity of Moscow's financial holdings, at about $7bn. Although White House backing will be seen in political terms and in legal terms important, it is not necessarily financially critical. Legal and Political Hurdles The proposal relies on the funds staying frozen solid. The EU executive is proposing to use a little-known mechanism in the EU treaty to prevent one country, such as Russia-friendly Hungary, blocking the renewal of European Union restrictions that underpin the immobilization of the holdings. But legal experts at the EU member state body, which represents participating countries, are skeptical about the legality of the step, which would change sanctions to a qualified majority decision, instead of a consensus-based one.