🔗 Share this article

While 2024 presidential bid, the former president pledged to steer clear of costly and often disastrous foreign wars such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan. This assurance was a key part of his non-interventionist “America first” agenda. Yet not long after his inauguration, American military units were conducting airstrikes in Yemen and Iran. Turning southward, Trump warned to seize the Panama Canal. Currently, US defense officials is preparing for potential strikes against so-called “terrorist” narco-trafficking organizations within the borders of Colombia and Mexico. Most immediate concern is a possible renewed White House attempt to forcibly impose a new government in Venezuela.

Venezuela's Response and Escalating Strains

Venezuela's president, the country's hard-left strongman leader, asserts that this campaign is already begun. He states that the US is conducting an “undeclared war” on his nation following several deadly attacks on Venezuelan ships in international waters. The US president last week notified Congress that America is involved in hostilities with narco-trafficking groups. He claims, without proof, that the attacked boats transported illegal narcotics destined for the US – and that Maduro bears responsibility. The administration has placed a $50m bounty on Maduro’s capture.

Latin American nations are anxiously watching a major US military buildup around Venezuela, featuring naval vessels, F-35 fighter jets, an attack submarine and 2,200 marines. These formidable resources are hardly much use for drug interdiction. But they might be used offensively, or to assist commando operations and bombing runs. Recently, Venezuela alleged Washington of an “illegal incursion” by several F-35s. Maduro says he is readying emergency powers to defend citizens if Venezuela comes under attack by the United States.

Questioning the Reasons For the Moves

What is Trump doing? Narcotics trafficking is a major issue – yet taking lives on a whim on the high seas, although frequent and hard to hold accountable, remains against international law. Moreover, United Nations reports state most of illegal drugs entering the US comes from Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, and is largely not transported through Venezuela. Trump, a former avoided military service, likes to act the tough commander-in-chief. He is now seeking to expel Venezuelan immigrants, many of whom originally fled to the US due to sanctions he himself enforced. Some analysts suggest he covets Venezuela’s vast oil, gas and mineral resources.

It’s true that the president and John Bolton, attempted to oust Maduro back in 2019 in an event Caracas described as an overthrow attempt. Additionally, Maduro’s 2024 re-election win was widely denounced as rigged. Given a free choice, Venezuelans would almost certainly vote out him. Furthermore, clashing political beliefs play a role, too. Maduro, poor heir to his predecessor's Bolivarian revolution, is offensive to the president's imperial idea of a US-dominated western hemisphere, in which the 1823 Monroe doctrine rules again and free-market capitalism functions unchecked.

Absence of Coherent Planning

Yet considering his inept missteps in other major international matters, the probable explanation for the president's behavior is that, typically, he hasn’t got a clue about his actions – in Venezuela or Latin America overall. No strategy exists. He throws his weight about, makes impetuous misjudgments, stokes fear of foreigners and forms policies on whether he approves of other leaders. Previously, when the Venezuelan leader on the ropes, Trump backed down. Now, full-scale armed involvement in the country remains unlikely. More probable is a heightened pressure campaign of destabilisation, penalties, maritime strikes, and aerial and special forces operations.

Instead of weakening and isolating Maduro's government, the US could bring about the exact opposite. The president is already exploiting the crisis to seize authoritarian “special powers” and mobilize public opinion with patriotic appeals for unity. The president's bullying towards additional socialist Latin American countries – like Colombia – and overconfident cheerleading for conservative leaders in Argentina and El Salvador – is provoking a regional backlash, as well. The majority of nations abhor the idea of a reversion to the past era of Yanqui meddling in Washington’s “back yard”.

Latin American Reaction and Diplomatic Setbacks

Trump’s effort to employ punitive tariffs and sanctions to strong-arm Brazil into pardoning its former conservative leader Jair Bolsonaro failed dramatically recently. Huge crowds demonstrated of Brazilian cities to defend what they perceived as an attack on Brazilian sovereignty and rule of law. The popularity of Bolsonaro’s successor, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, increased. Brazil is not, and will never become, a dependent state,” he declared. Lula told Trump, essentially, to back off. Then, when they met during the United Nations general assembly, Trump retreated and played nice.

The view of a great leap backwards in inter-American relations increases ineluctably. The White House sees the region mainly as a security threat, associating it with narcotics trade, criminal networks and immigration,” an analyst cautioned earlier this year. American policy has become fundamentally negative, favoring independent moves and dominance instead of partnership,” she said, stating: Latin America is viewed less as a peer and more as a sphere of influence to be controlled according to US strategic interests.”

Hawkish Officials and Rising Rhetoric

Trump’s hawkish aides are part of the issue: especially a senior official, White House top aide, and the secretary of state, an ex- lawmaker for Florida who is secretary of state and security advisor. In his view, a long-standing opponent of socialist governments in Cuba and Nicaragua, Maduro is unfinished business. Defending the naval strikes, he declared: “Interdiction doesn’t work. The solution is when you blow them up … And it’ll happen again.” From the top US diplomat, these are strong words.

Future Consequences

Trump’s efforts to revive the position of regional neighbourhood policeman, copying former president Theodore Roosevelt – an interventionist serial interventionist – are backward-looking, risky and counterproductive. Long-term, the main beneficiary will most likely be Beijing, an increasingly powerful regional actor, investor and leading member of the international bloc countries. As the US severs ties globally, Trump is helping China rise in influence.