🔗 Share this article

Throughout the beginning sections of the book Authentic, author Burey raises a critical point: everyday injunctions to “bring your true self” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are far from well-meaning invitations for individuality – they often become snares. This initial publication – a mix of personal stories, investigation, cultural commentary and discussions – aims to reveal how organizations take over individual identity, transferring the burden of corporate reform on to employees who are often marginalized.

Career Path and Wider Environment

The impetus for the publication originates in part in Burey’s own career trajectory: various roles across retail corporations, startups and in international development, interpreted via her perspective as a Black disabled woman. The dual posture that Burey faces – a tension between asserting oneself and aiming for security – is the core of her work.

It lands at a moment of widespread exhaustion with corporate clichés across the United States and internationally, as resistance to DEI initiatives grow, and various institutions are scaling back the very systems that previously offered transformation and improvement. Burey delves into that arena to assert that withdrawing from the language of authenticity – specifically, the corporate language that minimizes personal identity as a grouping of appearances, peculiarities and hobbies, leaving workers concerned with controlling how they are seen rather than how they are treated – is not an effective response; rather, we should redefine it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Performance of Persona

By means of vivid anecdotes and conversations, Burey shows how underrepresented staff – employees from diverse backgrounds, LGBTQ+ people, women workers, people with disabilities – soon understand to adjust which identity will “fit in”. A sensitive point becomes a drawback and people compensate excessively by working to appear agreeable. The practice of “bringing your full self” becomes a display surface on which various types of expectations are cast: affective duties, revealing details and constant performance of appreciation. According to Burey, workers are told to share our identities – but absent the protections or the trust to endure what comes out.

As Burey explains, workers are told to share our identities – but absent the protections or the confidence to endure what comes out.’

Real-Life Example: An Employee’s Journey

She illustrates this dynamic through the account of Jason, a deaf employee who chose to inform his co-workers about the culture of the deaf community and communication norms. His readiness to share his experience – a behavior of openness the organization often commends as “authenticity” – temporarily made everyday communications easier. However, Burey points out, that improvement was unstable. After staff turnover wiped out the informal knowledge the employee had developed, the environment of accessibility dissolved with it. “Everything he taught departed with those employees,” he comments exhaustedly. What stayed was the fatigue of needing to begin again, of having to take charge for an company’s developmental journey. According to Burey, this demonstrates to be told to share personally absent defenses: to risk vulnerability in a framework that praises your honesty but declines to institutionalize it into procedure. Sincerity becomes a snare when organizations depend on personal sharing rather than organizational responsibility.

Writing Style and Concept of Dissent

Her literary style is simultaneously clear and expressive. She marries intellectual rigor with a style of connection: an offer for audience to lean in, to challenge, to dissent. In Burey’s opinion, professional resistance is not loud rebellion but ethical rejection – the effort of rejecting sameness in workplaces that demand gratitude for simple belonging. To dissent, from her perspective, is to interrogate the narratives institutions tell about fairness and belonging, and to reject involvement in rituals that perpetuate unfairness. It might look like naming bias in a discussion, choosing not to participate of uncompensated “diversity” labor, or setting boundaries around how much of one’s personal life is made available to the institution. Resistance, she suggests, is an affirmation of personal dignity in spaces that often reward obedience. It represents a practice of honesty rather than rebellion, a approach of asserting that an individual’s worth is not based on corporate endorsement.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses brittle binaries. Authentic avoids just discard “authenticity” completely: rather, she calls for its restoration. For Burey, genuineness is not simply the unrestricted expression of individuality that business environment frequently praises, but a more intentional alignment between individual principles and individual deeds – an integrity that opposes distortion by institutional demands. Rather than viewing genuineness as a requirement to disclose excessively or conform to sterilized models of openness, Burey urges readers to maintain the aspects of it grounded in truth-telling, self-awareness and principled vision. According to Burey, the objective is not to give up on genuineness but to move it – to transfer it from the boardroom’s performative rituals and toward interactions and offices where trust, equity and answerability make {